Live!
Tue 19 Sep 2017
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College

Know something you shouldn't? Tell us, using our quick, 100% anonymous tip-off form!

Live! - Culture

Alice In Wonderland

Feb 27 2004 12:44
Martin Chong
Sadomasochism, drag queens and The Mad Hatter? It can only mean ICSM Drama?s performance of Alice in Wonderland.
Call a spade a spade? Not in Wonderland...

Alice in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll, is undoubtedly one of the most famous children?s books of all time. So when Imperial Medics Drama announced that they were performing an adaptation of Alice in Wonderland, it was certainly going to be a huge undertaking on their part. For the most part, this has been pulled off remarkably well.

The story of a girl following a rabbit into a weird and wonderful world of nursery rhyme characters, talking animals, talking flowers and even talking playing cards is one that demands a huge wilful suspension of disbelief from the audience. If the audience did not willingly accept that, then the whole tale would falter, as each new encounter seems stranger than the last. Thus it took a while to get comfortable with the play and its concepts as Seshi Manam, as an exceptional Alice, begins her adventure. However the ?unique? entrances and opening lines of two of the most famous characters from the book, The Cheshire Cat (Oliver O?Donovan) and then The White Rabbit (Tom Sterling) helps no end in this matter.

Throughout the play it is Alice that remains the continuous factor as the story meanders its way from one bizarre setting to another - almost, in fact, like different acts of a show following on from one another rather than related scenes from a play. But this is an attribute of the original book rather than any fault of the adaptation.

Notable performances from these ?acts? included the sadistic Duchess and her slave cook, played with disturbing enjoyment by Ginny Winstanley and Chris Kyndt, The Cannotentertainer (Andrew Al-Rais), simply for his accurate portrayal of nightclub bouncers all over the country, and the haughty Humpty Dumpty (Adam Hussein). However equal admiration has to go to whoever played the arms of the latter, as one hand action alone managed to earn as great a laugh as any one liner from the play.

This adaptation written by the director, David Bonsall, was almost a modernisation of the book, changing such locations as the Queen of Hearts? Croquet Ground to a nightclub and adding elements like the modern gas cooker to the house of the Duchess. Herein, however, lies my criticism. These two worlds, the modern and the traditional, sometimes felt disjointed when one came after another. The poetry reading by Tweedle Dee (Oli Smith) and Tweedle Dum (Lorne McEwan) in particular, though well done, seemed almost out of place.

On a more technical note, it was delightful to see the Union Concert Hall stage used to its full potential again, with trapdoors, flying scenery and revolving flats. Also used were a projector and two television monitors. These sometimes felt over employed or used in the wrong setting, especially the falling down a tunnel animation or when they noticeably went wrong.

Having said all this, it was a very enjoyable performance for the audience and, I believe, for the cast and crew. The comedy sustained itself throughout the performance in one liners and comic timing as they continued to produce the unexpected, like a drag Queen of Hearts (Richie Moss). However last word must go to the mushroom cartoon at the start of the second half - can someone please explain to me what on earth that was all about?

Friday 27th February is the last evening of performance with tickets at £7 for students and £8 for non students. Bookings can be made on http://www.fuggled.co.uk or tickets can be bought on the door.

Email this Article | Share on Facebook | Print this Article

Discussion about “Alice In Wonderland”

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
1. Gary   
Feb 27 2004 14:55
 

My unofficial photos can be found here

2. Nia   
Feb 29 2004 14:28
 

It was amazing. Lots of philosophical insight (Bonsall's as well as Carroll's). Lots and lots and lots of fun. Silliness, wit, brightly coloured costumes and characters. I really enjoyed myself.

I have to disagree with Martin over the projections, I don't remember feeling they seemed out of place and I actually really liked the tunnel animation with a small amount of imagination Alice really was falling in that sequence :-).

My main criticism of the play would be that it wasn't as polished as it might have been and this sometimes spoilt the moment. This is of course partly a manifestation of the short time in which the production was put together. It rode on it's enthusiasm, fresh ideas and humour (of which there was plenty so it carried pretty well) but would have made a deeper impact with more convincing, less hammy acting and care over details such as the catapillar's head coming away from it's body.

The use and choice of backing music was superb (where did you find that clip you kept using?!).

A random thought: the play sort of reminded me of the singular Stoppard play I've seen (Jumpers) because of the use of silliness to be philosophical and give morals & messages.

Mar 01 2004 09:54
 

Mushroom Animation here

Don't blame me, it was David's idea!

4. Steve   
Mar 01 2004 10:24
 

I think that in general all the ideas worked. Some may have suffered from lack of resources though. I have never seen the Concert Hall stage look quite so small and I feel they could have done with about twice the space they had.

As for the effects, the projection worked well - especially Alice walking 'through' the screen and into the projection.

In summary: I thought it was really cool and there were some very good performances by various actors.

Mar 01 2004 19:06
 

I'll take any criticism on the play, but not about that mushroom animation - I watch it on a loop everytime i'm at a computer... I love it, and if anyone thinks differently - I value your opinion even though it's wrong.

Glad you liked it guys.

D

Mar 02 2004 03:27
 

Don't get me wrong about the mushroom cartoon. I really liked it. I also thought it was a really good way of starting the second half. It was just a bit random, especially the eating of the bigger one...

7. Steve   
Mar 02 2004 14:24
 

It reminded me of a high-tech, high Terry Gillian cartoon from Monty Python - pass the narcotics...

Closed This discussion is closed.

Please contact the Live! Editor if you would like this discussion topic re-opened.

 
Live!

See Also

  1. Review of "The Grand Duke"
    06 Aug 03 | Theatre
  2. Sex and War on The Balcony
    04 Jun 03 | Theatre
  3. The Browning Version
    23 Mar 03 | Theatre

Live! Poll

How frequently would you like to see a CGCU magazine being published




Live!