Live!
Wed 21 Feb 2018
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College

Know something you shouldn't? Tell us, using our quick, 100% anonymous tip-off form!

Discussion

Your Chance to Quiz the Rector

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
Jun 05 2007 22:41
 

Sir Richard Sykes is coming to the end of his time as Rector, but Live! and stoic tv are giving you the chance to pose him some questions.

Click Here for the Full Article

Jun 06 2007 11:46
 

I have a question.

Dear Rector,

Why have you employed a bumbling fool to run your sports division?

Jun 06 2007 14:41
 

I'm an ex-Imperial student and when I was at the College the Union and Halls were fantastic major elements of my University experience. I'm sure the Rector would agree that ICU and Halls are a major asset to the institution, but is he confident that they're both safe in the long term?

Is it sustainable to have students living in incredible Victorian Grade II listed houses in South Kensington? As Rector Sykes has kept Imperial as a residential university generally resisting economic temptations to sell or change the use of some halls and I congratulate him for that; does he think his successors will be able to keep that up?

In terms of ICU does he believe that Students ought to be free to run their union as they see fit, if so why has the College sought powers to censor ICU managed student media? (Does he feel freedom of speech generally taken a hit in Universities and Society generally in his time as rector?) On the same topic of letting Students run their own union, is it possible that the new ICU court and proposed Trustee Board might result in those who're not elected student officers having too much influence over ICU? I can see some brilliant advantages in the proposed new structure particularly in relation to the permanent staff but am concerned about a shift of power from, and certainly a distraction from, the sovereignty of ICU council. What is Sykes' view of ICU's restructuring?

While writing this I came across a previous interview given by Sykes to Nature Jobs, in which he presents some brilliant ideas many of which he's put into practice at Imperial. Does think he'll find himself in a position in the future to take issues such as improving Graduate and PostDoc pay and training to on a national level? Just think what Lord Sykes could do for Imperial and UK science. http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/2004/040819/full/nj0065.html

  • ---

* An aspect I see as potentially weak is an excess of cross campus elections, do the Student members of the Trustee Board really need to be elected in that manner?, taken along with the other new posts might it introduce election fatigue and too much confusion/complexity. I think there's a lot of in-depth strength and legitimacy gained by electing representatives from discrete constituencies; I'll watch with interest to see what happens.

Jun 06 2007 14:41
 

I'm an ex-Imperial student and when I was at the College the Union and Halls were fantastic major elements of my University experience. I'm sure the Rector would agree that ICU and Halls are a major asset to the institution, but is he confident that they're both safe in the long term?

Is it sustainable to have students living in incredible Victorian Grade II listed houses in South Kensington? As Rector Sykes has kept Imperial as a residential university generally resisting economic temptations to sell or change the use of some halls and I congratulate him for that; does he think his successors will be able to keep that up?

In terms of ICU does he believe that Students ought to be free to run their union as they see fit, if so why has the College sought powers to censor ICU managed student media? (Does he feel freedom of speech generally taken a hit in Universities and Society generally in his time as rector?) On the same topic of letting Students run their own union, is it possible that the new ICU court and proposed Trustee Board might result in those who're not elected student officers having too much influence over ICU? I can see some brilliant advantages in the proposed new structure particularly in relation to the permanent staff but am concerned about a shift of power from, and certainly a distraction from, the sovereignty of ICU council. What is Sykes' view of ICU's restructuring?

While writing this I came across a previous interview given by Sykes to Nature Jobs, in which he presents some brilliant ideas many of which he's put into practice at Imperial. Does think he'll find himself in a position in the future to take issues such as improving Graduate and PostDoc pay and training to on a national level? Just think what Lord Sykes could do for Imperial and UK science. http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/2004/040819/full/nj0065.html

  • ---

* An aspect I see as potentially weak is an excess of cross campus elections, do the Student members of the Trustee Board really need to be elected in that manner?, taken along with the other new posts might it introduce election fatigue and too much confusion/complexity. I think there's a lot of in-depth strength and legitimacy gained by electing representatives from discrete constituencies; I'll watch with interest to see what happens.

Jun 07 2007 00:50
 

good job sir rich.

Jun 13 2007 23:26
 

You're running out of time to submit your questions, please get them in soon!

Jun 29 2007 22:55
 

Ask him why we're still third in the UK league of unis when we were number two when he arrived.

Add your comment:

If you can see this, something is broken (either with your browser, or with our system). Please leave the box below empty, or your comment will be considered to be spam.
Live!
Live!