Really? First its breaking and entering now illegal entry. I am tired of rehearsing these arguments, but it wasn't illegal entry if they didn't have any intention of damage or theft. (I just know some idiot is going to point out that there were planning on taking Spanner and Bolt - but that isn't theft, Dinesh had already signed a document agreeing they were violate). I can just tell this is going to get really boring...
As I predicted - rather boring. Its not "breaking and entering", its not "illegal entry", but now its trespass. Are we cycling through all the possibilities here? Why don't you go and speak to a lawyer (or even Hamish) first?
Indeed. Trespassers cannot be prosecuted - merely sued. And if they were doing it as representatives of the RCSU, then it is the RCSU which has to be sued. Only they can't - it's Imperial College on behalf ICU that gets sued.
But CGCU would have to bring the case against IC/ICU. Only CGCU are not a legal entity. So they would have to get Imperial College on behalf of Imperial College Union to bring the case.
In a bold attempt to teach the men and women of RCSU and CGCU how its done, IQ enters mascotry by declaring their Sacred Twister Set violate. Guarded day and night by an elite team of IQ male and female rugby players, they await the first challenge from the super sexy men and women of RCSU and CGCU execs.