Fri 23 Mar 2018
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College

Know something you shouldn't? Tell us, using our quick, 100% anonymous tip-off form!

Live! - News

Third-best university, but not satisfied

Jun 05 2006 15:53
Ashley Brown
The Times Good University Guide 2007 places Imperial in 3rd place once again, but shows students are not satisfied.
The Times Good University Guide - more respected than some other league tables

The usual suspects dominate the top five places in The Times Good University Guide, with Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial, LSE and UCL all performing well.

The Oxbridge duo head the table by an increased margin over last year, with UCL hanging on in 5th place behind Imperial and LSE.

What the numbers say

According to The Times, Imperial has the highest spending on facilities per student and the second-best job prospects, slightly trailing Cambridge. The largest differences between Oxbridge and Imperial come in entry requirements and the percentage of students graduating with "good" honours degrees. Ten percent fewer Imperial students graduate with a first or upper-second than at Cambridge, where nearly 85% leave with the top degree classifications.

Oxford graduates have the lowest job prospects of the top five, however benefit from the highest spending on library and computing facilities. Graduates who went on to jobs which do not require a degree, such as flipping burgers in fast-food chains, were not counted in the job prospects figures.


Instead of a teaching quality assessment, this year sees the guide incorporation of the National Student Survey's results, which polls final year university students for their opinions on teaching, support and personal development opportunities at their university. Imperial performed badly in the survey, having the lowest satisfaction score in the top 35.

With top-up fees coming into effect from October, student satisfaction scores will be closely scrutinised. Lack of consultation with the student body on issues such as building on the Queen's Lawn does little to help matters in this area.

The results of the survey are based mostly on data collected between 2001 and 2004, with some universities not taking part in the National Student Survey after their student unions voted to boycott it. Once again, London Metropolitan University refused to have their results published prompting the The Times to ask what they have to hide.

Email this Article | Share on Facebook | Print this Article

Discussion about “Third-best university, but not satisfied”

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
Jun 06 2006 18:18

How does this satisfaction study compare with previous years?

Jun 06 2006 18:25

They haven't completed this year's one yet, as far as I know. Last year's was the first one.

We'll get the results out when we have them!

Oct 21 2006 15:51

I remember back in days of yore, when this Rector's predecessor was around, that we used to come second, not third...

Far be it from me to criticise, though!

Add your comment:

If you can see this, something is broken (either with your browser, or with our system). Please leave the box below empty, or your comment will be considered to be spam.

Live! Poll

How frequently would you like to see a CGCU magazine being published