Mon 19 Mar 2018
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College

Know something you shouldn't? Tell us, using our quick, 100% anonymous tip-off form!

Live! - News

College Seeks to Gag Student Media

May 21 2007 13:23
The Dark Knight
College wants more control over the Union media, with a new agreement allowing them to force the removal of any publication and ban discussion of College staff.
Could we see more publications being impounded?

The College is seeking to silence student media in a draft copy of a new memorandum of understanding between College and the Union. The document, to be debated at Council this evening, contains both large and small changes, however it is a small one which is of most concern.


17. The officers of the ICU shall not permit discussions relating to the conditions of employment, performance or conduct of members of College or Union staff in articles, correspondence or other publications produced under the auspices of the ICU.
ICU Code of Practice, Annex H

Annex H of the new document, a revised Staff-Student Protocol, extends protections to College staff. Under the current MoU Union staff are protected from attacks in the student media, however College staff are fair game. Point 17 of the new Staff-Student Protocol, if it was passed, would prevent any Union "articles, correspondence or other publications" from commenting on College staff as well. This would prevent articles on useless Heads of Department, pay rises for academics or any criticism of the Rector. It is unclear whether commentary on academics taking controversial stances on world events or ethical issues would be affected, however it could certainly be interpreted that way.

The threat of having their face plastered all over campus on the front of Felix has been a useful deterrent against academics doing stupid things, or being generally useless. Indeed, it is rumoured some Heads of Department are terrified of it happening to them.

This extra addition to the SSP appears to affect more than just the media - "correspondence" indicates that discussion of College or Union staff in emails would also be banned, making the jobs of departmental representatives rather challenging.



Not content with rendering the Union and student media impotent, College are also seeking to introduce further controls. Annex F of the new ICU Code of Practice requires the ICU President to authorise removal of any material considered defamatory by the College Secretary. Should the editor of the publication in question object, then an "independent" arbitrator - in the form of the Pro-Rector (Education Quality) - will be brought in to decide whether the material removed is defamatory. The arbitrator may seek legal advice, however his or her ruling is final, with no scope for appeal.

The Annex sets no limits on how long an investigation into "defamatory material" may take, effectively allowing College to call something defamatory and have it removed for an indefinite period of time, "pending further investigation".

If, in the opinion of the College Secretary ... defamatory material has been published in any form in the ICU managed student media, the ICU President ... will authorise and arrange for the removal of the offending material immediately pending further investigation.
ICU Code of Practice, Annex F

This attempted control comes despite a statement in the body of the Code of Practice which claims: "The College accepts no responsibility for anything published by or on behalf of the ICU".

This year the Union established a procedure for dealing with complaints in a more rigorous manner, drawing on the experience of the Union Court to mediate in any disputes involving the media. The proposed trustee board would also provide another layer of absolute control, capable of taking any defamatory material out of circulation.

The College has been particularly concerned about the Union's media following Felix last year, which caused problems by its frequent attacks on Ethos and the Head of Sport Imperial, Neil Mosley. A series of negative articles eventually led to Felix being removed from Ethos, amid rumours that the negative press became quite expensive.

Email this Article | Share on Facebook | Print this Article

Discussion about “College Seeks to Gag Student Media”

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
1. Tris   
May 19 2007 13:35

Steve is heavily rooted in union media; I wonder what he has to say about this.

2. Alex   
May 19 2007 16:46

Just when I thought I couldn't possibly want to get out of this college any more... I'm glad this is my last year.

And good luck to anyone trying to hit me up for donations as an alumnus.

May 19 2007 16:57

Ha ha, this is mad! I bet ya it'll turn out to be an exageration. College have gone crazy recently, I guess there's been a bit of staff shake up / impending staff shake up. They just want to mess with the naughty boys and girls over the road.

May 21 2007 20:15

If this report has any basis in reality, and tbh I dont see why it shouldn't, it looks like some more blatant union-bullying behaviour from the college, and just serves to show why we shouldn't let them get their way with this. Seems like there's nothing they'd like more than to not have to deal with any actual students at their university.

May 22 2007 21:06

Could be worse, they could be trying to ban Facebook too:

Add your comment:

If you can see this, something is broken (either with your browser, or with our system). Please leave the box below empty, or your comment will be considered to be spam.

See Also

  1. Felix Missing
    04 May 07 | News
  2. College Branding Eats Union Shop
    27 Apr 07 | News
  3. Live! Editor 'Can't Keep it Up'
    16 Apr 07 | News

Live! Poll

How frequently would you like to see a CGCU magazine being published