Fri 23 Mar 2018
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College

Know something you shouldn't? Tell us, using our quick, 100% anonymous tip-off form!

Live! - News

Court Orders Election Re-run

Jul 05 2007 00:12
Ashley Brown
The GSA elections will be re-run after the ICU Court ruled they were unfair and sacked the returning officer.
People queuing with "Postscript" for a free coffee - if they'd all voted, turnout would have nearly doubled

The ongoing saga of the GSA elections took another twist this evening, as the ICU Court ruled that they were unconstitutional and must be re-run from the beginning. The Court delivered its decision with a "heavy heart", but said it had no choice given the wording of the constitution and the circumstances under which the election took place. It also expressed its dismay at the way the election was administered and sacked the returning officer and elections committee: a Court-appointed returning officer will take over for the re-run.

A number of different issues were referred to the Court including:

  1. the number of seconders in the election being lowered after nominations had closed
  2. insufficient publicity
  3. a post by an observer for one of the candidates on Live! indicating who may have voted

Item 3 was dismissed during the discussion, as the panel were of the opinion that the secrecy of the ballot had not been damaged by the post. Consequently an attempt to have the candidate disqualified for the actions of their observer was not considered, as no wrong-doing took place.

The matter of insufficient publicity was discussed, however emails, posters and the new GSA magazine "Postscript" were all used to advertise that an election was taking place. The Court concluded that the publicity was on the border of what was acceptable, but that it was not unconstitutional because the election had not been held in secret. The fact that only ten people voted was not seen as unconstitutional in its own right, however the Court did criticise the returning officer: she was informed that only three people had voted almost half way through the election and was unable to offer a suitable explanation as to why she thought turnout would increase dramatically in the second half.

The re-run was ordered solely on the basis of one point, that of the reduction in seconders after nominations. Originally set at 11 votes, this was reduced to 5 while nominations were open, then down to 1 when they had closed. The Court ruled that this was not acceptable, as the returning officer would have the power to decide who could or could not run by adjusting the seconders: the number of seconders must be set at the start of an election and not subsequently changed. This ruling will not apply retrospectively to the ICU Council elections at the start of this academic year, where the required number of seconders in the postgraduate constituencies was lowered after several candidates had trouble finding eleven people.

A further comment by the Court effectively banned extensions to the duration of a ballot while it was taking place, something which has occured many times in the past. In future any problems which would lead to an extension of voting times must be dealt with by a re-run.

The previous election is now null and void, with any results cancelled. New elections will be held as soon as possible, with the aim of concluding the ballot by the handover date of 1st August.

Email this Article | Share on Facebook | Print this Article

Discussion about “Court Orders Election Re-run”

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
1. An0n   
Jul 05 2007 05:09

fun, fun, fun...... who's going to be the RO of this new election then? I hope they manage to run it right this time around!

Logical decision, and for the right reason too. Complain if you like about the uber-hacks on Court, but they do know their s**t.

Jul 05 2007 13:17

I think a lot of hard working, competent hacks are going to be glad they're on holiday at the moment so they can't be asked...

Jul 06 2007 23:45

I'm good! Just ask anyone at ULU any candidate you like! I love democracy - I have the last say! No bleeding court! Disgrace! It isn't omnipotent!

Jul 11 2007 12:18

This article now includes a PDF of the ICU Court determination.

Jul 14 2007 09:45

I love Court. This makes perfect reading for a Baltic hangover. I think an issue we should look at is that this was allowed to happen with an election over which there has been so much discussion, we need to get this graduate rep thing right, and twice we?ve failed.

The other time being with the creation of the GPGS, I am personally very glad that this post is abolished, it just didn?t work. And I doubt the GSA is going to work this year, it is hard to believe that the voter turnout will increase dramatically.

6. yoyo   
Jul 16 2007 11:03

does anybody wonder if this election wouldn't have been rerun if it hadn't have been sir jon matthews-esq. FRS FRENG FRoftheworld, pro golf, cricket and polo player, first human to climb everest blindfolded and with his hands tied behind his back, survived a 200mph bike accident and completed the tour de france "just for fun one boring three weeks in november"-who won the election?

Add your comment:

If you can see this, something is broken (either with your browser, or with our system). Please leave the box below empty, or your comment will be considered to be spam.

See Also

Live! Poll

How frequently would you like to see a CGCU magazine being published