Live!
Tue 17 Oct 2017
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College

Know something you shouldn't? Tell us, using our quick, 100% anonymous tip-off form!

Live! - News

Report Calls for Degree Class Reform

Oct 16 2007 13:37
Andrew Holland
The VC of Leicester University has released a report calling for a reform of the degree classification system, adding an "achievement record" alongside the honours classification.
Soon you could get two scrolls instead of one

A report published today has recommended that the current system of degree classifications should be heavily reformed. The report recommends that a new system of grading, the Higher Education Achievement Record (Hear), should provide a detailed breakdown of marks and coursework, in addition to the current system of firsts, 2:1s, 2:2s and thirds. This would be the biggest change to the British degree ranking system in its 200 year history.

Proponents of the scheme, which has a proposed roll out date of 2010-2011, argue that it would give out more information about a candidate, which cannot be told under the current classifications. Bob Burgess, the Vice-Chancellor of Leicester University, and the chair of the enquiry team argues that "People ask why, if the system has been in place for some 200 years, is there a need to change? When the current system was established, there was a tiny higher education system. We've moved from an elite to a mass higher education system." A further point that is claimed is that the rise in the number of students achieving a first or 2:1 (now at 60%) has left many employers unsure if candidates are really suitable for jobs that they are theoretically qualified for. Certainly, it would help distinguish between students who scrape a 2:1, and those who miss a first by a whisker. Many league tables rank institutions based on the number of firsts and upper-seconds awarded, which may produce a temptation to artificially inflate grades.

However, doubts are already being expressed about the new system. Critics have argued that people would still be awarded one of the current degree classifications, which is what employers would still make the majority of their judgements on. Some believe a system such as in the USA, where students are given a Grade Point Average over their entire college career, would allow for a much clearer picture of candidates.

It is hoped that the scheme would allow employers to distinguish between candidates more easily. Of course a much better way could be to actually look at the candidates individually and base the decision on that, rather than basing their entire judgement on a person based on how they did on certain modules at university, which may not be particularly relevant for the job in question.

Email this Article | Share on Facebook | Print this Article

Discussion about “Report Calls for Degree Class Reform”

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
Oct 18 2007 01:28
 

A possibly related point is one of references; often employers require a university tutor reference partly perhaps to try and gain the information that is missing from current university transcripts. Some graduate employers appear to think they need a university tutor's reference to verify the fact you have your degree.

If you have a university tutor who can give you a reference is often something that comes down to chance. My assigned personal tutor at Imperial was rather anti giving out references; other academics quickly move to other institutions and retire etc. so the opportunity to get a reference from someone you have got to know might be lost through no fault of your own.

Promotion of the role of the registry in confirming qualifications, and providing transcripts to employers might help smooth the path of students from Imperial into their first jobs. I think the "transcript" does have potential for expansion and personalisation to take on some of the role of a reference; but I would not support any Record of Achievement (http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/university/roa/manual.html) style document, I think that's going to far.

Add your comment:

If you can see this, something is broken (either with your browser, or with our system). Please leave the box below empty, or your comment will be considered to be spam.
Live!

Live! Poll

How frequently would you like to see a CGCU magazine being published




Live!