Live!
Thu 20 Nov 2008
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College
Merrill Lynch

Live! - News

UL Summer Ball may replace IC Ball

Sep 05 2003 23:23
Nia Stevens
Recent discussions within Beit Towers have aired the possibility of a London-wide Summer Ball.
Alexandra Palace is no stranger to Union balls. The IC Summer Ball visited in 1998 and 1999.

It had been proposed that the UL Ball, which could be held at Alexandra Palace, could take place as early as summer 2004. Suggestions have been made though that it might be more feasible to put plans in place for an event in summer 2005.

Whenever it takes place, it is envisaged that the University of London Summer Ball would replace the IC Ball for that year since it’s estimated that there would be difficult to generate interest to generate sufficient ticket sales to support both events.

The UL Ball could be, however, bigger and more spectacular than any IC ball. It is thought that, should Alexandra Palace be used, the Ball could make use of its full 10,000 person capacity.

Although no key decisions have yet been made, members of the ICU Executive have privately expressed their support for the idea. Support for the idea outside of ICU is mixed. One Union source asserts that as well as ICU, some smaller and medium sized college Unions have also expressed enthusiasm for the idea, but declined to identify which. Comments were made however that ‘Kings are wavering’ and that though UCL are protective of their own summer ball they did express the opinion that their own ball isn’t very good.

Interest for the event within ULU itself has been described as ‘luke warm’, however the Ball need not necessarily be organised by the federal union - a consortium of London Unions could organise a London-wide Summer Ball off their own backs. Whether organised through ULU or as a consortium of Unions, the financial arrangements for an event of this scale that is not guaranteed to break even, have great potential to become contentious. In attempt to overcome some of the problems, it’s been suggested that a company could be set up to manage the Ball. Each Union taking part in the ball would be a shareholder of this company and the board of directors would constitute representatives from the Unions. Another option aired is that of employing an external company with experience in such large scale events to organise the ball.

There are many hurdles to be overcome and many factors to be considered before this idea becomes a reality. On the somewhat frivolous side though, one factor that will probably put many Imperial College students in favour of a ULU wide ball; that the male-female ratio at other London colleges is considerably more even than at Imperial.

Email this Article | Share on Facebook

Discussion about “UL Summer Ball may replace IC Ball”

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
Sep 06 2003 07:34
 

Intriguing. They're looking for it to go ahead in summer 2004, but it might be more feasible to plan for summer 2004.

I'm confused.

Not to mention a pedantic little man.

Sep 06 2003 11:18
 

nice i dea but i wonder if people would go. those who are committed ulu types already have the purple's ball after all. also i've always thought the nice thing about college-wide events is that you can turn up and see people you know. what hope of that in 10,000 drawn from 27-odd colleges?

Sep 06 2003 12:11
 

The purple's ball is not a comparison. The Purples are only awarded for sporting achievement. It is akin to a very selective colours dinner, not an all inclusive Summer Ball.

And while you may not see people you know, the chances of the average IC male pulling are greatly increased due to the fact that no-one's met you before, so they don't know what a t**t you probably are. Also it's dark and a greater number of women will be drunk. Your chances are massively better.

Sep 06 2003 13:39
 

point taken about the purple's ball but resorting to insults about the other thing just proves my point i think.

i disagree about more women being more drunk at a ulu event, anyhow; imperial seems to attract a particularly ethanolophilic strain of femininity (albeit in limited numbers).

Sep 06 2003 18:29
 

Although most IC students, sorry most male IC students (oops, i repeat myself) do spend most of the year trying to pull, I dont think that the aim of the summer ball, for most people at least, is to find someone to get off with.

Certainly for those graduating (and for other years too) it is seen as far more of an opportunity to go out with your friends, at an event that is there to celebrate the end of the year that you've all just about finished working through together.

I think people would go, sinc groups of friends wanting to celebrate the year coming to an end would be just as, of not more, likely to go to a larger ULU wide event (where there may well be more people they know... some IC students do occasionally talk to other UL people) since it would be an even larger, flasher event for the like-minded people.

Anyway, to my point of curiousity... are IC students so mind-bogglingly insular that they wouldn't go to an event just because it was also being attended by people from colleges of a lower intellectual caliber?

Sep 07 2003 23:22
 

Your picture caption is wrong. IC did not visit Alexandra Palace in 2000, it did so in 1998 and 1999 (the photo is from the 199 version).

It was supposed to be at Ally Pally in 2000, but instead got moved to the Paragon Hotel in Earl's Court.

Oh dear.

Sep 08 2003 11:36
 

Re: caption, this is the 1999 version alright as it had all these rides and toys that you see, the 1998 was not as extravagant but was still in Ally Pally. Ally Pally was too expensive so the ball had no choice but to eventually move nearer to college, i.e in college!

Sep 08 2003 12:10
 

Corrected.

9. ijh   
Sep 08 2003 19:45
 

pedant: just what do you mean the ball was "supposed" to be at Ally Pally? if by "supposed to be" you mean "dramsoc would have rather the ball was" then by all means carry on.

Sep 08 2003 23:32
 

Dude. No offence to those who organized the Summer Ball. But it looks really w***. And that Ally place is so god damn g**.

Sep 11 2003 15:53
 

"being attended by people from colleges of a lower intellectual caliber?"

Lower intellectual **calibre** perhaps though at least we can spell ;-)

12. idris   
Sep 14 2003 13:45
 

or of course: Kaliber. Though just how intellectual non-alcoholic beer is remains to be debated.

No I'm not sure what I mean either.

Sep 14 2003 14:06
 

Interesting that UCL should assume that category applies to them...

14. Sam   
Sep 15 2003 11:50
 

ahh, you may spell correctly, however grammar is not your strong point.

For your sentence to make real sense, it should be:

"Lower intellectual **calibre** perhaps {PUNCTUATION} though at least we can spell ;-)"

Where {PUNCTUATION} should be a comma or possibly a semi-colon. Do try and be correct when you are being pedantic - otherwise you look stupid.

Sep 15 2003 12:53
 

Sam: the bald one should know better than to use an M-line in the place of a colon. Never underestimate the uses of a colon.

Sep 17 2003 10:54
 

Speak for yourself. ;-)

"Where {PUNCTUATION} should be a comma or possibly a semi-colon."

If you want to be *really* pedantic, that's not so much of a sentence as a fragment (which comes up with a green underline in Microsoft Word for any technogeeks reading).

17. tom t   
Sep 17 2003 13:50
 

try typing 'mispelt' into Microsoft Word.

Never believe what Americans tell you.

Closedd This discussion is closed.

Please contact the Live! Editor if you would like this discussion topic re-opened.

 
Live!

See Also

Live! Poll

Which club smashed up pubs in Hammersmith?





Live!
20 Readers Online
0 on this page