Tue 20 Mar 2018
- The award-winning student news website of Imperial College

Know something you shouldn't? Tell us, using our quick, 100% anonymous tip-off form!

Live! - Opinion

This article is an opinion piece and should be taken as such. It is highly likely to be biased, but either the article itself or the ensuing discussion will probably be entertaining. Live! takes no editorial line on opinion pieces.

UL and ULU: Last Chance of Redemption?

Apr 03 2007 13:42
Ashley Brown
Changes are afoot at both UL and ULU, in what could be the last chance for both institutions to survive.
The Stalinist Senate House

Predicting the demise of the University of London has been a fashionable past-time over the last few years, starting with talk of the Imperial/UCL merger and continuing as the UL colleges applied for degree-awarding powers.

As Imperial prepares to formally withdraw, exercising its own degree-awarding powers in the process, more doubt has surrounded the competence of the university in itself and its viability and desirability in the future. Colleges have long complained about the federal university's bureaucracy, particularly those more under its direct influence.

The University

UL is now entering what may be its last chance for survival. A consultation process, started in 2005, has begun circulating new proposals which reduce the size of various committees and decimate the bureaucracy. From 2008, more power will be handed to the colleges, giving a true federal structure rather than one of part dominance, particularly over finances.

Changes in UL come as the University of London Union has been critical of the institution whose students it represents, due to ULs aggressive attempts to make it a department. Having spent tens of millions of pounds on rewiring Senate House, there are suggestions that the university would like to make a quick buck by selling or leasing ULU's buildings and operations. After much legal advice has been thrown around, UL has grudgingly accepted that a students' union cannot become a department, but the relationship with ULU is badly damaged.

The Union

The ULU building - rich pickings (Photo: Kaihsu Tai)

ULU, like UL, is also seen as a dinosaur in need of reform. Its structures are seen as impenetrable to many and this year's ULU President Vicki Slater has started the process of reform, whilst fighting off the university at the same time. Next year's ULU President Jennifer Huseman was elected in part because of her reformist view, so the reformation of the dinosaur looks set to continue.

If it can reform, threats to ULU still remain. Rumours suggest that UL has been actively encouraging colleges to withdraw their support for it, in an attempt to undermine and close down an organisation which has assets ripe for stripping. Huseman is a fan of "direct action" (protests, occupations etc), so UL could yet find protestors at its doors demanding a better attitude.

Yet concerns have been raised that Huseman could be the death of ULU, with her promises to "work comprehensively with the anti-war movement". As ethical as an anti-war movement may seem, a perception by the UL colleges that their money is being squandered on activities not directly affecting students could undermine the union at the very time when it needs to show itself delivering real changes for real students, whilst providing value for money. Without the support of the London colleges, ULU faces as an uncertain future.

Huseman describes herself as a "disabled, mature, international student of mixed ethnic & cultural background" - almost every minority interest group going. This may all be so, however what seems like political box-ticking will make little difference to the very real threats ULU will need to meet head on, when faced with an institution which seems increasingly keen to take it out. Her experience includes a great deal of activism, in the areas of student rights, the environment and (helpfully for reform) governance. Fighting off a marauding beast determined to gut you for your disastrous financial situation is a different proposition altogether.

In Conclusion

Both the University of London and its union are undergoing reforms, with the aim of cutting through the bureaucracy and streamlining the organisations. An increasingly aggressive university seems keen on ridding itself of ULU one way or another, while at the same time taking heat from those who believe the university itself has outlived its usefulness.

UL(U) is a sorry state indeed, with the balance of power in Bloomsbury looking to radically alter over the next 5 to 10 years.

Email this Article | Share on Facebook | Print this Article

Discussion about “UL and ULU: Last Chance of Redemption?”

The comments below are unmoderated submissions by Live! readers. The Editor accepts no liability for their content, nor for any offence caused by them. Any complaints should be directed to the Editor.
Apr 23 2007 12:43

"Its structures are seen as impenetrable to many and this year's ULU President Vicki Slater has started the process of reform [...]"

Actually, the current wave of reform was initiated by ULU Council in 2003-4, which the passing of the Transformation Policy. Ironically, I proposed to the ULU Exec the previous year that we undergo a 'root and branch' governance review - this was voted down by the Exec, which proposed abolishing most of ULU's unwieldy and completely undemocractic committees and creating a management board (a modern day trustee board).

ULU has suffered in the last few years from short-termism and a poor culture of delivery and governance.

Add your comment:

If you can see this, something is broken (either with your browser, or with our system). Please leave the box below empty, or your comment will be considered to be spam.

Also In Random Rant

  1. Extended Conge$tion Charge Starts
    19 Feb 07 | Random Rant
  2. Toilet Tantrums
    13 Feb 07 | Random Rant
  3. Sabbs in Brief Spanner Theft
    20 Sep 06 | Random Rant

See Also

  1. UL After ULU Services
    31 Oct 06 | News
  2. UL Agrees Withdrawal
    05 Oct 06 | News
  3. Formal UL Withdrawal Begins
    19 Jul 06 | News

Live! Poll

How frequently would you like to see a CGCU magazine being published